vulnerability.jpgMicrosoft’s Jeff Jones, the security strategy director of Microsoft’s own Trustworthy Computing Group, unleashed the big news on June 21st that Vista is more secure than both Linux and OSX in a posting on his blog.

I don’t even know how to properly address the level of stupidity in this Wonderful News Item, but here are a few quick points.

    a) If it’s so damn secure, why didn’t MS have a third-party evaluate the security of the operating systems in question?
    b) Are they so fucking stupid at MS that they expected this to be heralded as Good News after being corporate piranhas for 25 years?
    c) Given the level of Open Source loathing for MS, was this supposed to be something to celebrate?

Furthermore, someone at Microsoft needs to give Jeff Jones some basic training in how to write PR blurbs (let’s face it, that’s what this is. Real techies won’t be touching Vista seriously until the first service pack anyway). His tone is arrogant, insipid, and quite foolish. According to him, Vista is Chateau Galliard. Perhaps he should remember that Richard I’s “impregnable fortress” fell to the Muslims less than a year after it was constructed.

I swear, I can’t figure these wonks at Microsoft out. Their reputation is shit most of the time anyway; why poke a stick in the eye of everyone who would loooove to have a go at hacking Vista, knowing that with any true evaluation of the operating system, all their claims would fall flat?

If MS had any brains at all, they’d be trying to get the OSF guys on their side instead of continually antagonizing every IT professional in the world by making outlandish claims. Vista may be good, but to say it’s better than everything else right out of the gate, when history has sadly and painfully taught us that MS products have always been dogs until they’ve been in true production environments, hacked to bits, and patched out the ass is breathtakingly microencephalatic.

You wanna impress us, Jeff? Put a server out on the internet and give us a time limit. You’ll get your ass blown off, and you know it.


2 Responses to “Vista more secure than Linux! (says Microsoft)”

  1. Todd Jonz says:

    Mycroft asks:

    > If it’s so damn secure, why didn’t MS have a third-party
    > evaluate the security of the operating systems in question?

    They have done in the past, and they’ve always gotten the results they desired — which only goes to show that you can pay some analysts to “prove” just about anything.

    > Are they so fucking stupid at MS that they expected this to be
    > heralded as Good News after being corporate piranhas for 25 years?

    No, they’re so fucking stupid that they actually believe their customers will buy into crap like this (and the sad part is that some will.)

    > Given the level of Open Source loathing for MS, was
    > this supposed to be something to celebrate?

    If MSFT can’t taunt the open source community, how do you expect them to have any fun up there in Redmond during the rainy season?

    I’m actually beyond being bothered by this kind of stuff and have rather come to expect it. I’m far more concerned about the patent sabers that MSFT has been rattling at the Linux community of late. I predict that when finally SCO goes broke as a result of its numerous frivolous copyright lawsuits againt Linux (which knowledgeable sources predict will happen before the end of the year), MSFT will bring its first patent suit within six months. Are you listening, Red Hat? ;-)

  2. Justin Williams says:

    I think Fake Steve said it best: What utter shitbags.

Leave a Reply